Energy, data, environment
1428 stories
·
2 followers

Counterintuitive Secrets for Learning How to Live a Happy Life

1 Share

Stephanie Harrison is an expert in the science of happiness and founded a company called The New Happy, where she teaches millions of people how to be happier. Through it, she hosts The New Happy podcast. She is also a Harvard Business Review and CNBC contributor, and her work has been featured in other publications such as Fast Company, Forbes, and Architectural Digest. She regularly speaks at Fortune 500 companies, advising on employee wellbeing and company culture.

Below, Stephanie shares five key insights from her new book, New Happy: Getting Happiness Right in a World That’s Got It Wrong. Listen to the audio version—read by Stephanie herself—in the Next Big Idea App.

Audio Player

1. Everything you know about happiness is a lie.

When I was in my early twenties, I had everything that I thought would make me happy. I had a prestigious job, lived in New York City, and had complete freedom. Yet, I was absolutely miserable. At first, I ignored my emotions. Then, over time, I started to experience more challenges: getting physically ill, struggling with my mental health, and feeling lonely. One day, I found myself lying on my bedroom floor sobbing hysterically, wondering why I was so desperately unhappy.

Then, I had a moment of clarity. What if there wasn’t something wrong with me? What if I had been lied to by the world around me? Perhaps everything I had been told about what I needed to do to be happy was wrong.

At that moment, I didn’t know exactly what the lies were, but now, after ten years of research, I do. I call it Old Happy: our society’s incorrect definition of happiness and the culture we’ve created around it. Old Happy begins with the messages we receive as children from our families, all the way through to the media we consume and the institutions that enforce it. It comes from three cultural forces of individualism, capitalism, and domination, which tell us that to be happy, we must perfect ourselves, do more and more, and do it all by ourselves.

The devastating truth is that pursuing these objectives won’t make you happy. In fact, both research and experience show that it will actually make you miserable.

2. A happier life starts with unwinding Old Happy.

Due to Old Happy, Americans are struggling with unprecedented levels of unhappiness, illness, burnout, and loneliness, with no idea what’s wrong or what they need to do to feel better again. The evidence I’ve amassed about the harms of Old Happy is astounding. To live truly happy lives, we start by letting go of our Old Happy beliefs and adopt new ones by undergoing three key shifts:

  • Old Happy taught you that you’re not good enough and that there’s something wrong with you. Instead, you need to start seeing that you are worthy exactly as you are.
  • Old Happy taught you that, to prove how good you are, you must achieve a certain set of external goals and succeed. Instead, you need to focus on expressing yourself and growing as a person in whatever way feels authentic to you. You are not defined by your successes or failures.
  • Old Happy taught you that you have to do everything by yourself. Instead, you need to see that you are connected to others and that no one does anything alone. We are social creatures who are wired to need support. You are inextricably connected to others.

The best way to do this is by naming Old Happy when you see it pop up in your life. When you feel the pressure to overwork, say to yourself, “That’s Old Happy, not me.” When you judge your appearance, remind yourself, “I’m comparing myself to Old Happy’s made-up standards.” When you feel like you can’t ask for help, tell yourself that no one ever does anything alone, and it’s perfectly human to need support.

3. The real secret to happiness is counterintuitive.

Once we’ve named Old Happy and started unwinding it from our lives, we can discover the real secret to happiness. If you want to be happy, you need to help other people be happy. This is the proven path to happiness, supported by my research across multiple fields.

Everyone wants to live a happy life. The way to experience that is through finding ways to be of service to one another. Helping others is scientifically proven to benefit our wellbeing; it connects us to one another and helps us find a greater purpose in life. It doesn’t just improve your mental health but your physical health, too. Just like we have a need for food and shelter, we also have a profound need to go beyond ourselves and help others.

“If you want to be happy, you need to help other people be happy.”

Many people have a narrow definition of helping: we think of it as going out and volunteering. While that’s a wonderful way to help, we need a more expansive understanding. You help by listening to your loved ones, holding the door for someone, collaborating at work, sharing your ideas and unique perspective, and encouraging others to be their best. Every day, there are countless ways to help, meaning there are countless opportunities to experience happiness.

4. You possess unique gifts that need to be shared.

I argue that the best way to help others comes from sharing your unique gifts with those around you—whether in your family, communities, at work, or for the broader world.

There are three types of gifts that all human beings possess: humanity, talent, and wisdom:

  • Your humanity is who you are as a person. It’s your character, your best qualities, your good and loving nature. When you call a friend to listen to them talk about a challenge, take time to play with your kids after work, or smile at a stranger on the street, you are using your humanity gifts.
  • Your wisdom is what you have learned. Each of us possesses a completely unique life packed with experiences that teach us important and meaningful lessons. That wisdom can be used to help people in countless ways—from helping others through hard times to preventing them from ever happening.
  • Your talent is what you can do. Talents are cultivated through time, energy, and effort. Every single one of us has the power to either develop new talents or deepen existing ones, using them to inspire others and make powerful contributions.

Your gifts are what make you you. When you use them in service of others, you’ll experience profound joy, purpose, and contentment. That’s what New Happy is all about: being yourself and giving of yourself.

5. Your happiness has the power to change the world.

When we live by Old Happy, we are not only making ourselves miserable, but we’re contributing to creating a world that makes the collective unhappy, too. It only leads to competition, judgment, disempowerment, burnout, and isolation. No one wins when Old Happy is our dominant understanding of happiness.

But when you adopt New Happy, all of that changes. Through your daily actions, you’re now contributing to making the world a better place. By helping others experience happiness and by devoting your incredible gifts to the problems we face, you are slowly but surely transforming the world into a place where more and more people get to be happy. Isn’t that what we all long for? A better, more just, more compassionate world?

I often hear from people in my community that they feel so helpless about the state of the world. But you can start making it better right now simply by changing your definition of happiness and living in alignment with it. Working for the greater good facilitates your highest good.

To listen to the audio version read by author Stephanie Harrison, download the Next Big Idea App today:

Read the whole story
strugk
4 days ago
reply
Cambridge, London, Warsaw, Gdynia
Share this story
Delete

Nationalise Us

1 Share
Read the whole story
strugk
12 days ago
reply
Cambridge, London, Warsaw, Gdynia
Share this story
Delete

Swedish startup bets big on zinc-ion batteries with world’s first megaplant

1 Share

Swedish startup Enerpoly has opened the world’s first zinc-ion battery megafactory. Its vision is to scale a better alternative to lithium-ion for storing renewable energy over longer periods of time.

The Enerpoly Production Innovation Center (EPIC) facility is located north of Stockholm. Commissioning has already begun and the plant is expected to make the first zinc-ion batteries next year. The company aims to reach a maximum production capacity of 100MWh by 2026 — enough energy to power around 20,000 homes.

In 2018, Dr. Mylad Chamoun made a breakthrough in zinc-ion battery chemistry while pursuing his PhD at Stockholm University. Later that year, he teamed up with his former colleague Dr. Samir Nameer and the duo founded Enerpoly. The partners saw a gaping hole in the market where lithium-ion wasn’t competitive — offering 2 to 10 hour energy storage. They believed zinc-ion batteries could fill the gap.

Making zinc-ion batteries work

Using zinc in batteries isn’t anything new. The AA batteries that power your most precious (read, junk) toys and gadgets are made from zinc and manganese oxide. This chemistry has made companies like Energizer and Duracell a tonne of money.

However, zinc-ion batteries have historically, for lack of a better word, sucked at recharging. This is because zinc-ion chemistries are plagued by dendrites — crystals that cause short circuits. They also lose capacity fast.

The <3 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol' founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It's free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

“Enerpoly has innovated across the entire zinc-ion battery system — including anode, cathode, electrolyte, and separator design — to solve these inherent problems,” the company’s CEO, MIT-educated aerospace engineer Eloisa da Castro, told TNW.

Enerpoly uses zinc metal for the battery’s anode, manganese dioxide for the cathode, and a water-based electrolyte to carry charged particles between the two sides.

Unlike lithium, zinc is globally abundant. Moreover, Sweden is home to the largest zinc reserves in Europe — about 2% of the world’s total. Enerpoly hopes to establish a completely European supply chain for its batteries and make the continent a “zinc-ion powerhouse.”

Zinc-ion for energy storage

Different from lithium-ion battery developers, Enerpoly is targeting the energy storage market – not EVs and smartphones. Use cases include renewable energy storage, shifting energy loads on the grid, and increasing power resiliency — within the 2-10 hour storage mark.

The batteries are modular — multiple packs can be placed in parallel to make larger systems. The company claims the packs are non-toxic, non-flammable, and non-explosive.

Because the materials they use are a lot more abundant, Enerpoly believes it can be cost-competitive with myriad other short-to-mid term energy storage technologies under development. These include lithium-ion batteries, thermal heat storage devices, liquid air batteries, iron flow batteries, gravity batteries, and even this CO2 dome.

And investors seem to agree. To date, the company has raised just shy of €15mn. Over €8mn of that came from the Swedish Energy Agency to construct the EPIC factory.

CEO Da Castro told TNW the company is also planning to close its Series A this year, as they look to scale up towards the 2026 target of 100MWh. In July, Enerpoly acquired state-of-the-art dry electrode manufacturing equipment from bankrupt startup Nilar that it will use in its new plant. Beyond 2026, the startup is eyeing its first gigafactory.

Read the whole story
strugk
12 days ago
reply
Cambridge, London, Warsaw, Gdynia
Share this story
Delete

The Uruguayan company teaching people how to turn regular cars into EVs

1 Share

In 2010, Uruguayan president-elect José Mujica made headlines for the bright blue mini-truck he rode to his inauguration ceremony.

The vehicle, which looked like any ordinary pickup truck, was used to convey a message: Uruguay was serious about its quest to become more environmentally friendly. The gas-powered four-wheeler had been transformed into an electric vehicle by Organización Autolibre, a local retrofitting company.

Viral press coverage of the ceremony put the company in the spotlight, sparking interest from EV enthusiasts inside and outside Uruguay who wanted to convert their gas-guzzling vehicles into economical EVs. 

“This news coverage in many media outlets across Latin America gave a lot of visibility to this technology, and to this day we tour the region every year across Peru, Mexico, Argentina,” Gabriel González Barrios, founder and CEO of Organización Autolibre, told Rest of World. “The same distributors of Autolibre systems permanently invite us to train the necessary technicians to generate the local ecosystem for the local development of this industry.”

Over the years, González Barrios and his team at Organización Autolibre have helped convert thousands of traditional vehicles into e-cars across 14 Latin American countries. The company trains individuals and mechanics through online courses, and supervises conversions for corporate fleets. So far, at least 40 companies have used Organización Autolibre’s services, González Barrios said. While some countries have flagged concerns about the safety of retrofitting vehicles, González Barrios said his company is leading efforts to make it a safer and standardized practice across Latin America.

“We want to show it’s an industrialized process,” Andrés García, the owner of a retrofitting shop in Bogotá, Colombia, which works with Autolibre, told Rest of World. “This is not for hobbyists or people who are inexperienced.”

González Barrios had the idea for the company in 2006 after watching the Al Gore-produced climate change documentary An Inconvenient Truth. A distributor of chemical products for gas-fueled vehicles at the time, he was inspired to address environmental concerns from his corner of the world.

“We decided to change the combustion engines of our own vehicles into zero-emission electric ones,” said González Barrios. The experiment was successful and affordable, and led him to found Organización Autolibre.

González Barrios initially used some American EV kits to retrofit vehicles, but when those became too costly, Autolibre partnered with Zhuhai Enpower Electric, a Chinese electric power system company.

Over the last few years, as the popularity of EVs has grown, so has interest in retrofitting regular vehicles, Bruno González, head of sales at Autolibre, told Rest of World. In 2011, the company retrofitted a fleet of delivery vans for Bimbo, the largest bread-making company in the world. Bimbo did not respond to questions from Rest of World.

In its 2020 report about the practice, the Latin American Association of Sustainable Mobility revealed that at least 145 retrofitted vehicles had been officially registered.

The Latin American Retrofit Association, co-founded by González Barrios, now has more than 30 members across the region. All are either distributors of EV retrofit kits or have workshops specializing in the process.

Retrofitting electric vehicles has been practiced worldwide for over 30 years, with countries like Japan and Australia establishing national guidelines for the process. A report from the Latin American Association of Sustainable Mobility lists 21 companies that currently sell EV retrofit kits for different vehicles across the world.

The biggest incentive to retrofit a vehicle is its affordability, said González Barrios. Most new EVs available in Latin America remain out of reach for regular car users. One of the most popular models, the electric Renault Kwid, costs around $18,100. Converting an existing gas or diesel-engine car into an electric vehicle using Autolibre’s process starts at $6,000.

Since the practice is largely a DIY process, there are no official statistics on the retrofitting industry in Latin America. Many retrofitting jobs are done “by tinkerers who seek to extend the life of their petrol cars since they can’t afford a new electric one,” Adolfo Rojas, president of the Association of Entrepreneurs to Promote Electric Vehicles in Peru, told Rest of World.

The retrofitting process requires skilled EV technicians to remove the engine, gas tank, exhaust, and other components within a regular car, and fit the electric motor, batteries, on-board charger, and computer into the empty space. Weight has to be carefully distributed so the car doesn’t tilt to one side. The original electrical components — such as airbags and sensors — must function properly, and the battery shouldn’t overheat. Autolibre Academy, the company’s educational branch, offers online courses on these basic skills to any EV enthusiast interested in retrofitting, González said.

But Rojas said there are risks associated with the retrofitting process.

Retrofitting kits, many of which are available on online marketplaces like Alibaba or MercadoLibre, often don’t guarantee a “minimum level of safety and quality for the retrofit unit,” Rojas said.

Once they’ve been modified, retrofitted vehicles must get government permits that allow them to be on the road in specific countries, according to retrofitting experts.

In 2021, the Chilean transport ministry passed legislation banning the retrofitting of all used passenger vehicles. “Retrofits were being done, but keeping the car’s safety level was being overlooked,” Rodrigo Salcedo, president of Chile’s Electric Vehicle Association, told Rest of World. A safety compliance regulation is being prepared by the transport and energy ministries.

In Colombia, where retrofitted vehicles face no legal impediment, some are arguing for tighter controls.

A nine-week newsletter series exploring the ways technology is reshaping spirituality and religion.

García, from the car shop in Bogotá, said he is working with fellow retrofitting experts and enthusiasts to lobby for specific regulation, including meeting with the Colombian transport department and SENA, the country’s professional and technical training service. He said his company sells retrofit kits exclusively to certified technicians.

Jairo Novoa, one of García’s customers, retrofitted a 1981 BMW. He told Rest of World the process made sense for an old car like his because spare or repair parts are expensive and hard to find.

Although most of Colombia’s more than 11,000 electric vehicles are brand-new, retrofitted ones “do not need to envy” them, said Novoa. Except maybe, “really expensive ones like Tesla.”

Read the whole story
strugk
14 days ago
reply
Cambridge, London, Warsaw, Gdynia
Share this story
Delete

Who killed the world?

2 Shares

This is a prototypical world in a 1950s sci-fi film.

It takes place in a world similar to one in which the viewer lives.

But there’s an existential threat looming in the background. It’s mysterious, scary – and a bit exciting.

In the narrative, the protagonists explore this mysterious phenomenon.

They use science and technology to learn more about it.

And even though the story presents the possibility of failure, the protagonists figure it out.

It feels like the triumph of humanity.

I analyzed the top 200 sci-fi films and tv shows every decade from the 1950s to present day.1 What I found was that sci-fi narratives from yesteryear were quite different from today’s stories.

¹ Based on votes the film or tv show received from IMDB users. More on methodology at the end of the story.

In the 1950s, only a few sci-fi films and shows took place in the future, like the Fire Maidens of Outer Space (1956) which is a film about astronauts landing on one of Jupiter’s moons. For the most part, these stories were set in the audience’s present day – so, the 1950s.

(Hover on a box for details)

In these 1950s stories, the world is often upended by an existential threat.

But in the majority of films, the protagonists figure it out – and leave the world better than the beginning of the story.

Sci-fi is an amazing genre.

It helps us explore our feelings about the unknown, the future, and the possible. It lets us imagine “what if” scenarios, and then build out rich worlds that our minds can occupy. It depicts dystopias we should fend off and utopias we should seek – and it teases us with the scintillating possibility that humans may actually be able to build the world we want.

But over the last few generations, it’s been harder for us to imagine this better world – and our sci-fi reflects that.

This is a prototypical sci-fi setting in more recent years.

We’re in the near future – often a world that looks like ours, but with hints that something has already gone terribly wrong.

Today’s sci-fi is more likely to depict a world that is worse than our reality.

It’s maybe even a dystopian or post-apocalyptic world

This world is almost always marked by economic inequality, human suffering, and sometimes even a militarized, authoritarian society.

In this world, the protagonists face an existential threat.

And to defeat the threat, we must face societal conflicts that feel insurmountable – and we must face conflicts within ourselves that make us question who we are and what we’re doing .

Ultimately, the story is likely to be a commentary on today’s social issues. It’s a warning of what is to come – or a reflection of a current reality that we’ve tried hard to ignore.

The changes to sci-fi stories didn’t happen overnight. Sci-fi slowly evolved over the last few generations.

There’s been a steady increase in sci-fi stories that take place in the future – and it’s usually the near future, like the 2013 film Her – a world where a man falls in love with an artificial intelligence.

Even plots that take place in the present could be interpreted as the near-future.

The stakes are still the same as before; these sci-fi stories still present existential threats.

But we’re now more likely to face these existential threats in a dystopian or post-apocalyptic world, like Mad Max: Fury Road (2015). In the film, the world is a desert wasteland ruled by a warlord who enslaves several women to produce his offspring. When the women escape, in hopes of finding a preserved paradise, they leave behind a message:

“Who killed the world?”

This dystopian society is more likely to be marked by inequality – gaps in opportunity, wealth, and basic rights.

This often leads to a world marked by great amounts of suffering.

And increasingly, sci-fi stories depict militarized societies – although we might be seeing that trend turn around this decade.

There’s almost always a “bad guy” – a human antagonist who tries to kill the world or at least gets in the way of saving the world.

But these days, it’s much more likely that protagonists also have to overcome societal forces – political movements, systemic inequality, rampant capitalism.

These are basically things that seem too big to fix.

It’s also far more likely that the narrative explores inner conflicts – moral dilemmas, identity crises, and wrestling with our understanding of what it means to be human.

We don’t just face outside threats; we also face threats within ourselves.

Ultimately, today’s sci-fi stories are far more likely to be a commentary on current social issues. These might be critiques of political ideologies, runaway capitalism, irresponsible innovation, human apathy, or eroding mental health.

But even though the narrative arc starts us off in a terrible place, the protagonists make the world better over the course of the story. Jurassic Park author Michael Crichton argued that this is necessary: “Futuristic science fiction tends to be pessimistic. If you imagine a future that’s wonderful, you don’t have a story.”

It’s often framed as the triumph of humanity.

But it certainly doesn’t feel triumphant. It often feels pessimistic – and it’s something that critics have noticed.

I think it’s because today’s sci-fi is set in a world where humans have already screwed up, and the narrative arc is basically the protagonists digging out of that hole.

Line chart of a narrative arc showing stories start at the bottom of the arc.

But as we walk out of the theater, we’re thrust back into reality – a world where we’re still facing existential threats like climate change, authoritarianism, devious technology, and war. And if these sci-fi stories are prescient, it means that we will soon experience those existential threats; the world will soon turn into a dystopian hellscape; and only after that do we figure it out.

In other words, the worst is still ahead of us.

Line chart of a narrative arc showing the bottom of the arc is ahead of us.

News stories constantly remind us that we’re headed for trouble. Children are being murdered, authoritarianism is on the rise, and Earth is inevitably going to warm so much that it will likely kill millions of people. Given this, how could we possibly imagine a less bleak future?

But maybe that’s what sci-fi can explore.

Author Neal Stephenson wrote in 2011: “Good SF supplies a plausible, fully thought-out picture of an alternate reality in which some sort of compelling innovation has taken place.” Journalist Noah Smith argues that optimistic sci-fi needs to have “several concrete features corresponding to the type of future people want to imagine actually living in.”

So, what if we figure it out?

What if we create spaceships that explore further than we could have ever imagined?

What if we embrace our natural curiosity and work toward discovering more and more of this wondrous universe?

What if we ensure that even the least fortunate among us have reliable housing, food, and healthcare?

What if we reject the notion that an economy must produce more and more, but rather embrace the idea that a functioning society is only as successful as its least privileged soul?

What if we build civilizations that don’t try to conquer nature, but rather try to be a part of it?

What if our technological innovations didn’t come from efforts to decimate each other, but rather from a constant desire to better each other’s lives?

I know, I know.

Right now, it’s hard to see that future. We see terrible things all around us – hunger, disease, mass murder, greed, an increasingly uninhabitable planet.

But unlike the world of Mad Max, our world has not yet been killed. There are still monumental efforts to stop hunger, to limit disease, to build more resilient governments, to wake us from the hypnosis of war, to sail deeper into the galaxy and to see closer into the atom. We can still create a world where the patches of paradise blossom into the wastelands.

I admit it’s hard to see. In fact, I admit that I’ve spent most of my journalism career telling a narrative about the wastelands bleeding into our lives – a sort of fear-mongering, I suppose.

But maybe that’s why it’s so important for us to imagine a different future – precisely because people like me made it so hard to see.

After all, if we can’t see paradise, how can we possibly navigate toward it?

Read the whole story
strugk
61 days ago
reply
Cambridge, London, Warsaw, Gdynia
Share this story
Delete

Ants can perform life-saving amputations on their wounded, study says

1 Share

Until the discovery of antibiotic medicine last century, doctors frequently performed amputations to save the life of a patient with an infected wound.

But humans aren’t the only animal to perform this type of surgery on one another.

Scientists have discovered that a species of ant found in the southeastern United States also perform amputations when their nestmates are perilously injured on the leg, staving off the spread of infection from an open wound and effectively saving their comrades’ life.

“The level of sophistication with which they have evolved to care for their injured is unrivaled in the animal kingdom. Our human medical system would be the closest match,” said Erik Frank, a behavioral ecologist at the University of Würzburg who led the study, in an interview Wednesday. “These amputations stopped infections from spreading into the body … the same way medieval amputations worked in humans,” he said, adding that the findings mark the first recorded example of a nonhuman animal performing an amputation on a fellow member of its species to save its life.

The study, published Tuesday in the journal Current Biology, suggests that Florida carpenter ants (Camponotus floridanus) are able to differentiate between types of wounds and adapt their healing responses accordingly. It adds to our growing understanding of the sophisticated strategies ants deploy to care for one another when injured, including by triaging the wounded and treating the infected with microbial substances.

The scientists observed the amputations in laboratory conditions as performed by the Florida carpenter ants, a reddish, black, or brown ant which typically measure under 1/2 an inch in length. Unlike some other ants, Florida carpenter ants do not have the ability to produce antimicrobial secretions from their glands to combat pathogens in wounds. “We wanted to see how a species that lost this gland would still care for their injured,” said Frank.

The scientists set out by deliberately injuring around 100 ants on the leg: either the femur (closer to the body) or the tibia (farther down the leg), to compare how fellow ants in their colony responded. They found that the ants effectively performed amputations when their nestmates had sustained femur injuries, but never performed amputations when an equivalent injury was sustained on the tibia.

In the former, a helper nestmate performed an amputation on the injured insect’s entire leg in over three-quarters of cases.

The ant amputation procedure lasted around 40 minutes and followed the same pattern each time: “They start licking the wound with their mouth parts and then they move up the leg with their mouth until they reach the shoulder. There, they will start to bite quite ferociously for many minutes at a time,” said Frank. “The injured ant will sit their calmly, allowing the procedure to occur and not complaining until the leg is cut off.”

Among the ants with a femur injury, 95 percent of those that received an amputation survived, while only 45 percent of those who did not receive an amputation survived, Frank said.

“The ants — in their world, in their context — have found a strategy that is highly efficient and has a very, very high level of success,” concluded Frank.

Laurent Keller, an evolutionary biologist who also worked on the study, said the amputations were performed very effectively. “It means that when they do the amputation they must do it in a very clean way to prevent bacteria from entering the wound,” he said.

In contrast to the treatment received by ants that sustained a femur injury, ants that sustained a tibia injury (further down the leg) were never observed receiving an amputation from fellow nestmates. “In this case, they only clean the wound,” said Keller, who said the nestmates instead provided an extended wound care session involving lots of licking.

The wound cleaning method also proved effective. While around 70-75 percent of those who received wound cleaning from fellow ants survived, only 15 percent of the ants with tibia injuries survived when they were isolated from their fellow ants and left unattended, Frank said.

One possible explanation offered by the scientists for the decision on when to perform an amputation has to do with how hemolymph — a fluid equivalent to blood — flows within invertebrates.

The theory has not been tested yet, but scans show that the tibia area of the leg has greater hemolymph flow than the femur area, meaning that pathogens that enter through the tibia will spread more quickly to the rest of the body. This, in turn, significantly shortens the window of opportunity for an amputation to stave off an infection from spreading. “If the wound is at the level of the tibia then they don’t do an amputation. This is because normally the blood — or hemolymph for insects — circulates quite rapidly. So within 40 minutes the blood will already carry the bacteria into the body of the ant,” explained Keller.

The painstaking efforts adopted by ants to care for each others’ wounds illustrates how social insects reap benefits from behaving altruistically, said Keller. “By helping each other, they are indirectly helping themselves,” he said.

“Evolutionarily speaking, the colony saves a massive amount of energy by making sure their injured keep well, rather than just throwing them away and replacing them with a new worker,” he said. Previous studies show that ants that have lost one or even two legs can still be productive members of their colony, returning to their normal running speed in as soon as one day — and are often deployed to perform the most dangerous tasks. He added: “Even in ant societies, the individual holds value.”

Read the whole story
strugk
62 days ago
reply
Cambridge, London, Warsaw, Gdynia
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories